CARELAW: National Healthcare, Employment Law & Mediation Practice

 
 

Home Page

Continuing NHS
Care Funding

Articles and 
Information

Guidance
Documents

News  

Employment
Disputes

Care Standards

Act 2000

Updated

Testimonials

Case Histories New

Press Releases

Care Standards New
Tribunal Decisions  

Alternative Dispute
Resolution

Free Continuing
NHS Care
Assessment

Personal Care
Products

Other Links

Guest Experts'

New

Corner

Contact Us

 


The Uk's Healthcare Law Service


 

Robert Campbell & Company


Care Standards Tribunal Decisions

INTERESTING CARE STANDARDS TRIBUNAL DECISIONS

The Care Standards Tribunal was set up under the Care Standards Act 2000 and sits to hear regulatory actions involving care homes, care workers, domiciliary care agencies and all others regulated under that legislation.

The Tribunal consists of three members plus a clerk and is chaired by a lawyer (often a retired Judge or senior barrister) flanked by two experts. The experts are selected having regard to the type of case to be heard and are drawn from a variety of sources.

The tribunals generally sit in the geographical area where the service is carried on.

Generally speaking the Tribunal’s decision is final but there are two other possibilities. First the Tribunal can be asked to “review” its decision if either party believes a mistake has been made. Otherwise the only way forward is an appeal to the High Court but only where it can be alleged a point of law arises in the decision. These are rare but we have been involved in such challenges arising under the predecessor legislation The Registered Homes Act and those cases helped shape the Law of Care that we have today.

Although not legally binding, the Tribunal decisions tend to be followed by the Chairmen and are frequently quoted in their decisions. We list below some of the more interesting Care Standards Tribunal decisions with links to the full text of each:

Type  Name  Synopsis 

Care Home Felden Croft –v- NCSC Appeal in relation to registration conditions. One of the earliest (failed) costs applications.
Click for the full decision.

Care Home Murphy –v- NCSC  Fitness appeal against cancellation of registration. Integrity questioned. Convictions for benefit fraud. Staff also implicated. Failure to notify convictions.
Appeal dismissed.
Click for the full decision

Private hospital/Clinic Raphael Medical Centre -v- CSCI Appeal against decisions to register as “care homes” instead of “independent hospitals” upon transfer of registration under Care Standards Act.
Click for the full decision.

Care Home Woodlands Care –v- NCSC Appeal regarding definition of “care home”. Legal issue as to the burden of proof. Application to sign terms of registration. Appeal dismissed.
Click for the full decision

© web content copyright © Robert Campbell 2010
web design and code  © 56kb.com 2010

Back to the top